Onsight vs OkBet 2026 — head-to-head
Onsight and OkBet are both Telegram-native Polymarket bots with anonymous teams, but they optimise for different things. Onsight is Polymarket-only with AES-256-encrypted Gnosis Safe wallets, 13-chain auto-converting deposits and a 3-5 second pre-confirmation data edge — and posts 203 monthly active users on $5.12M cumulative volume (rank #39). OkBet is the OG multi-venue bot covering Polymarket, Kalshi, Limitless and Opinion with Google Cloud KMS key encryption and a $OK token rebate model, with $11.4M cumulative volume (rank #27) but only 28 monthly active users. Onsight wins for default Polymarket use; OkBet wins if you genuinely trade four venues.
Onsight
Free — no platform fee, gas-free trading via Polymarket relayer
Best for: Polymarket traders who want a non-custodial Telegram bot with serious key isolation + multi-chain on-ramp
Visit Onsight →OkBet
Free Telegram bot · 1% per-trade fee · $OK token (Solana, May 2025 launch)
Best for: Traders who route across multiple prediction-market venues from a single Telegram surface and want enterprise-grade key encryption
Visit OkBet →The verdict
Onsight 4.4/5; OkBet 4.4/5. Same headline rating, very different shape. Onsight is the better Polymarket-default Telegram bot in 2026: cleaner non-custodial architecture (AES-256-encrypted Gnosis Safe wallets with user-exportable keys), a broader on-ramp (13 chains / 50+ currencies auto-converted to USDC.e on Polygon), zero per-trade fee, gas-free relayer execution, and — most importantly — 203 monthly active users versus OkBet's 28. That retention curve is the cleanest retail-distribution signal in this slice. OkBet wins on venue breadth (4 platforms in one chat), enterprise-grade Google Cloud KMS key encryption, and a larger lifetime volume number that reflects its OG status. But if you're trading Polymarket — which is most users — Onsight is the better default.
Where Onsight wins
- 203 monthly active users vs OkBet's 28 — ~7x healthier retention curve and a much cleaner retail-distribution signature.
- AES-256-encrypted Gnosis Safe wallets with user-exportable keys — arguably stronger non-custodial guarantee than KMS-managed encryption.
- 13-chain / 50+ currency deposit auto-conversion to USDC.e on Polygon — by far the broadest on-ramp in the Telegram-bot tier.
- Zero platform fee and gas-free trading via Polymarket's relayer. OkBet charges 1% base on buys and sells.
- 3-5 second data-ingestion edge ahead of on-chain confirmation — meaningful for copy-trading and wallet-following.
- Prosumer execution set: market + limit orders, stop-loss, take-profit, slippage protection, copy trading from selected wallets.
- Discord wallet-activity monitors with custom thresholds — a second surface that OkBet doesn't replicate.
- 60-second Telegram onboarding via @PolysightBot with auto-created Safe wallet on Polygon.
Where OkBet wins
- Four-venue coverage in a single Telegram account: Polymarket + Kalshi + Limitless + Opinion. Onsight is Polymarket-only.
- $11.4M cumulative routed volume (rank #27) vs Onsight's $5.12M (rank #39) — historically the larger Telegram-routing builder.
- Google Cloud KMS encryption for user keys — enterprise-grade key-management service rather than rolled-from-scratch crypto.
- Polymarket-verified ✓ tick — official platform validation Onsight does not advertise.
- $OK token on Solana (live since May 16, 2025) with fee rebates that can take the 1% per-trade fee toward 0% for top holders.
- Earliest-mover credibility: defiprime calls OkBet the bot that 'pioneered Telegram trading for Polymarket'.
- Web trading terminal at okbet.trade in addition to the Telegram bot — Onsight is Telegram + Discord only.
- Solana↔Polygon bridging built in — necessary because $OK lives on Solana while Polymarket settles on Polygon.
Pricing showdown
Onsight: Free. No platform fee, gas-free trading via Polymarket's relayer, free USDC withdrawals. The only implicit cost is the spread you'd pay on Polymarket regardless of bot choice. A trader routing $100k of volume in twelve months pays Onsight $0.
OkBet: 1% base fee on buys and sells, reducible toward 0% for $OK token holders at premium tiers. A trader routing $100k of volume across a year pays roughly $2,000 in fees (1% buy + 1% sell on round-trip notional), before any $OK rebate. To get fees to zero you need to hold a non-trivial $OK position — which is itself exposure to a Solana memecoin-adjacent token launched May 16, 2025.
Twelve-month math: Onsight is free regardless of volume. OkBet's all-in cost depends on how much $OK you're willing to hold to discount the 1% fee. For traders who don't want token exposure to get cheap execution, Onsight is materially cheaper.
Feature parity matrix
| Feature | Onsight | OkBet |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free (no platform fee) | 1% base, $OK rebates toward 0% |
| Venues covered | Polymarket only | Polymarket + Kalshi + Limitless + Opinion |
| Key encryption | AES-256 (Gnosis Safe, user-exportable) | Google Cloud KMS |
| Custody model | Non-custodial Gnosis Safe | KMS-managed keys |
| Deposit on-ramp | 13 chains / 50+ currencies | Polygon + Solana (bridged) |
| Gas fees | Zero (Polymarket relayer) | User pays gas/bridging |
| Order types | Market + limit + SL + TP + slippage | Buy/sell + copy |
| Copy trading | Selected wallets | Leaderboard, address, or @-mention |
| Monthly active users | 203 | 28 |
| Cumulative volume | $5.12M (rank #39) | $11.4M (rank #27) |
| Native token | None | $OK on Solana (May 16, 2025) |
| Second surface | Discord wallet monitors | Web terminal at okbet.trade |
✓ = supported · ✗ = not supported · ◐ = partial / caveats
Verdict by trader type
Onsight's 60-second Telegram onboarding, zero fees, and gas-free execution make it the lowest-friction entry point. OkBet's 1% fee and $OK-token rebate ladder add cognitive load a new trader doesn't need.
If Polymarket is 80%+ of your activity, Onsight's deeper feature set (limit + SL + TP), broader deposit on-ramp, and pre-confirmation data edge dominate OkBet's multi-venue spread.
If you genuinely trade Kalshi, Limitless, or Opinion alongside Polymarket from a single Telegram surface, OkBet is the only bot here that aggregates all four venues.
AES-256-encrypted Gnosis Safe wallets with user-exportable keys are arguably stronger than Google Cloud KMS for a non-custodial product — you can leave Onsight and keep your wallet. With KMS, leaving means re-keying.
Onsight vs OkBet — frequently asked questions
01 Why does Onsight have lower lifetime volume but more monthly actives?
OkBet is older and accumulated $11.4M over a longer period, but its current monthly active user count is 28 — concentrated whale activity, not retail distribution. Onsight's 203 monthly actives on $5.12M cumulative is a much healthier retention curve and a cleaner signal of genuine consumer-Telegram product-market fit in 2026.
02 Is AES-256 + Gnosis Safe really better than Google Cloud KMS?
For a non-custodial product, arguably yes. Onsight encrypts keys with AES-256 and stores them in user-controlled Gnosis Safe wallets that you can export at any time — if Onsight disappears tomorrow, you still control your wallet. OkBet's Google Cloud KMS is enterprise-grade key management, but the keys live inside Google's KMS under OkBet's control. KMS is the better engineering primitive; Gnosis Safe + exportable keys is the better self-custody guarantee.
03 Can I use both bots?
Yes. Telegram has no exclusivity constraint and both bots create separate wallets, so there's no key conflict. A reasonable pattern is Onsight as your Polymarket default (zero fees, broader on-ramp) and OkBet when you specifically need to trade Kalshi, Limitless or Opinion from the same chat.
04 What about the $OK token — should I hold it?
$OK launched on Solana on May 16, 2025, and the rebate ladder takes OkBet's 1% fee toward 0% for top holders. Whether that's worthwhile depends on how much volume you route and your appetite for holding a Solana token launched by an anonymous team. For most traders, Onsight's zero-fee model is cheaper than holding enough $OK to zero out OkBet's fees, without the token exposure.
05 Both teams are anonymous — does that matter?
Yes, with caveats. Neither Onsight nor OkBet publicly discloses founder names or funding. We confirm Onsight via docs.tradeonsight.com and Polymarket Builder Program on-chain volume; we confirm OkBet via Polymarket-verified ✓, RootData, defiprime, polymark.et and on-chain volume. Both pass the verifiability bar for inclusion, but you should size positions accordingly — these are not regulated financial products and there is no recourse if either team disappears.
06 Which is better for copy trading?
Onsight, narrowly. Its 3-5 second data-ingestion edge ahead of on-chain confirmation means copy trades can fire before the source wallet's transaction settles — a meaningful edge for wallet-following strategies. OkBet's copy-trade UX is friendlier (leaderboard, address, or @-mention in chat), but it's executing against on-chain confirmations like everyone else.
Final recommendation
Pick Onsight as your default Polymarket Telegram bot. Zero fees, gas-free execution via Polymarket's relayer, AES-256-encrypted Gnosis Safe wallets you can export, a 13-chain deposit on-ramp, and 203 monthly active users on $5.12M cumulative volume make it the cleanest non-custodial product in this tier. Pick OkBet only if you genuinely route across Polymarket plus Kalshi, Limitless or Opinion from a single Telegram surface, or if you want $OK token exposure as part of your fee model. Both teams are anonymous, both are verifiable on-chain, and both can run side-by-side without conflict — but for the default Polymarket use case, Onsight is the better bot in 2026.