Kreo vs OkBet 2026 — head-to-head
Kreo and OkBet are both Telegram-native multi-venue prediction-market bots run by anonymous teams. Kreo routes $58M cumulative across 6,793 users (rank #5) via a Privy enclave + Gnosis Safe architecture covering Polymarket + Kalshi. OkBet is the OG, covering four venues (Polymarket + Kalshi + Limitless + Opinion) with Google Cloud KMS encryption and a $OK token on Solana, but it sits at $11.4M cumulative across 407 users (rank #27). Kreo wins on a roughly 17x user-count gap and a roughly 5x volume gap.
Kreo
Free Telegram bot · revenue from Builder/Kalshi fee share
Best for: Polymarket+Kalshi traders who want a Telegram bot with serious key-isolation
Visit Kreo →OkBet
Free Telegram bot · 1% per-trade fee · $OK token (Solana, May 2025 launch)
Best for: Traders who route across multiple prediction-market venues from a single Telegram surface and want enterprise-grade key encryption
Visit OkBet →The verdict
Kreo 4.5/5; OkBet 4.4/5. Same surface (Telegram), same buyer (cross-venue prediction-market traders), wildly different traction. Kreo has compounded into 6,793 cumulative users and $58M routed at rank #5 on the all-time Polymarket Builders leaderboard, with 2,045 monthly actives — a retail-heavy distribution that one organic reviewer (@isaiahefes) called 'infrastructure for serious prediction-market operators.' OkBet pioneered the Telegram-on-Polymarket category (credited by defiprime as the pioneer), now spans four venues (Polymarket + Kalshi + Limitless + Opinion) and shipped a $OK token on Solana on May 16, 2025 — but its leaderboard footprint is $11.4M cumulative across 407 users at rank #27, with only 28 monthly actives. Kreo wins on every traction metric that matters; OkBet wins on venue breadth and token alignment.
Where Kreo wins
- Roughly 17x cumulative user gap: 6,793 (Kreo) vs 407 (OkBet) on the Polymarket Builders registry — the single largest signal in this comparison.
- Roughly 5x cumulative volume gap: $58M (Kreo, rank #5) vs $11.4M (OkBet, rank #27).
- 2,045 monthly active users vs 28 — Kreo's flow is genuinely retail, OkBet's is concentrated.
- Privy enclave + Gnosis Safe smart-contract wallets in secure enclaves — TEE-grade key isolation, non-custodial at the smart-contract layer, distinct from KMS-encrypted hot wallets.
- Organic third-party endorsement from @isaiahefes calling it 'infrastructure for serious prediction-market operators' — unsolicited operator-tier validation.
- AI Match wallet recommender and unusual-activity detection on top of standard copy-trading — features OkBet doesn't surface.
Where OkBet wins
- Four-venue coverage: Polymarket + Kalshi + Limitless + Opinion vs Kreo's two (Polymarket + Kalshi). Widest single-Telegram surface in the category.
- OG status: defiprime credits OkBet as having 'pioneered Telegram trading for Polymarket' — earliest-mover narrative in the segment.
- $OK token on Solana (live May 16, 2025) — gives holders fee rebates trending toward 0% and a points-and-rewards loyalty loop Kreo has no equivalent for.
- Google Cloud KMS encrypted key management — enterprise-grade key custody primitive that's verifiable and well-understood.
- Web trading terminal at okbet.trade in addition to the Telegram bot — useful for users who want a screen surface alongside chat.
- Solana↔Polygon bridging built in — necessary for $OK holders but also handy for cross-chain settlement flexibility.
- Polymarket-verified ✓ tick on the official builder registry.
Pricing showdown
Kreo: Free Telegram bot. Revenue comes from Polymarket Builder Program fee share and Kalshi affiliate routing, not from user-facing per-trade fees. Subscription and performance fees are mentioned on the marketing site for premium features but the core copy-trading flow is free to start.
OkBet: Free Telegram bot but with explicit 1% buy/sell base fee per trade. The fee is reducible toward 0% if you hold tiered amounts of $OK on Solana. For a user routing $10,000/month, that's $100/month in fees before any rebate — non-trivial versus Kreo's free baseline.
Twelve-month math: Kreo is effectively $0/year for the average copy-trader. OkBet at 1% on $10k/mo routed = $1,200/year before $OK rebates. To match Kreo's all-in cost you'd need to hold enough $OK to push your effective fee close to 0% — which is itself a capital allocation decision.
Feature parity matrix
| Feature | Kreo | OkBet |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free (Builder fee share) | 1% per-trade, rebates with $OK |
| Cumulative volume | $58M (rank #5) | $11.4M (rank #27) |
| Cumulative users | 6,793 | 407 |
| Monthly active users | 2,045 | 28 |
| Venues covered | Polymarket + Kalshi | Polymarket + Kalshi + Limitless + Opinion |
| Key custody | Privy enclave + Gnosis Safe | Google Cloud KMS encryption |
| Token | None | $OK on Solana (May 16, 2025) |
| Web app | kreopoly.app companion | okbet.trade full terminal |
| Copy-trading | Yes + AI Match recommender | Yes (leaderboard / address / @-mention) |
| Unusual-activity detection | Yes | No (push notifications only) |
| Team transparency | Anonymous | Anonymous |
| Polymarket-verified | Yes | Yes |
✓ = supported · ✗ = not supported · ◐ = partial / caveats
Verdict by trader type
Free Telegram surface, AI Match auto-recommends profitable wallets to copy, no per-trade fee to model out. Kreo's 2,045 monthly actives also mean the support and community surface is much larger.
If you're routing meaningful volume on Polymarket + Kalshi, Kreo's $58M / rank-#5 traction signals operator trust the market has already validated. The Privy enclave + Gnosis Safe stack is the most architecturally serious in the Telegram-bot tier.
If you actively trade Limitless or Opinion alongside Polymarket and Kalshi, OkBet is the only Telegram bot covering all four from one account. Worth the 1% fee if the alternative is juggling four interfaces.
$OK holders get fee rebates trending toward 0% plus a points-and-rewards loop. If you'd hold the token anyway for Solana exposure, OkBet's economics flip in your favor versus Kreo's flat free tier.
Kreo vs OkBet — frequently asked questions
01 Why is Kreo's user-count gap over OkBet so wide?
Kreo has compounded 6,793 cumulative users to OkBet's 407 — a roughly 17x gap on the Polymarket Builders registry. OkBet was the earlier mover but Kreo's product loop (Privy enclave non-custody + AI Match wallet recommender + unusual-activity detection) appears to have captured the retail copy-trading mainstream. The 2,045 vs 28 monthly-active split shows the gap is widening, not narrowing.
02 Is OkBet's 1% fee a dealbreaker versus Kreo's free tier?
Depends on routed volume. For a user routing $10k/month, OkBet's 1% = $1,200/year before $OK rebates. Kreo's core copy-trading is free to start (Kreo earns from Builder Program fee share, not user fees). To match Kreo's all-in cost you need to hold enough $OK to push your effective fee toward 0% — which is itself a capital allocation. If you trade Limitless or Opinion (which Kreo doesn't cover), the 1% may still be worth it.
03 How do the key-custody architectures actually compare?
Kreo uses Privy (Stripe-owned) to provision Gnosis Safe smart-contract wallets held in secure enclaves — TEE-grade isolation at the wallet layer, so the trading layer never directly touches user funds. OkBet uses Google Cloud KMS to encrypt private keys server-side. Both are credible; Kreo's stack is closer to true non-custody (smart-contract wallets) while OkBet's is enterprise-grade key encryption (hot wallet with KMS-managed keys). For a Telegram bot, the Privy + Gnosis Safe model is the more trust-minimized architecture.
04 Both teams are anonymous — does that matter?
Yes, and it should be acknowledged. Neither product has disclosed founders, funding rounds, or corporate registration beyond what's on the public domain registry. Mitigations: both have on-chain volume that's independently verifiable on the Polymarket Builder leaderboard, both are Polymarket-verified ✓, both have third-party coverage (CoinCodeCap, MEXC, ai-polymarket.com for Kreo; polymark.et, defiprime, RootData for OkBet). For a Telegram bot you trust with key material, prefer the trust-minimized architecture (Kreo's Privy + Gnosis Safe).
05 Does OkBet's $OK token change the calculus?
Only if you'd hold the token anyway. $OK is a Solana asset (live for trading since May 16, 2025) that gates fee rebates and a points-and-rewards loop. If you're allocating to Solana ecosystem tokens and want fee discounts on prediction-market routing, $OK is functional. If you're a pure Polymarket trader who doesn't want token exposure, the token doesn't help you and Kreo's free baseline is cleaner.
06 Which has more credible third-party validation?
Kreo: organic endorsement from @isaiahefes ('infrastructure for serious prediction-market operators'), plus CoinCodeCap, MEXC News, ai-polymarket.com and polyzone.app coverage, plus rank #5 cumulative volume. OkBet: defiprime credit as the Telegram-Polymarket pioneer, polymark.et and RootData listings, Polymarket-verified ✓. Both are real products; Kreo's validation skews toward operator-tier endorsements while OkBet's skews toward category-history credit.
Final recommendation
Pick Kreo if you want the Telegram-native prediction-market bot the market has already chosen — 6,793 cumulative users, $58M routed at rank #5, Privy enclave + Gnosis Safe non-custody, free to start, and the AI Match wallet recommender on top. Pick OkBet only if you actively trade Limitless or Opinion alongside Polymarket and Kalshi (it's the only Telegram bot covering all four venues), or if you'd hold the $OK token anyway for fee rebates. For the 90% of users who just want a Telegram bot for Polymarket + Kalshi copy-trading, Kreo's traction gap (17x users, 5x volume, 73x monthly actives) settles the question.