What 9 real users actually say about Polymarket bots.

"Meanwhile in Pathfinder 1e, minmaxing is either: "Alright, here's my fifteen feats, including a custom species and mix-and-match spells, multiclassing five times and gaining a +1 disease resistance from including a luxury washroom in my house. My build is still kind of mediocre though." (and it's actually mediocre by minmaxing standards) or "So if you pick Wizard, make yourself really old, take a bunch of CON maluses and Thoth of the Forgotten Pharaoh, you can die during character creation and also explode into fiery snakes!""

"Minmaxer’s strategies online > Custom-Lineage Multi-Class: “So you need 3 lvls of Assassin Rogue, 3 lvls of Gloomstalker Ranger, 5 lvls of Echo Knight Fighter, 2 lvls of Paladin, 9 lvls of Divination Wizard, a magic sword you’ll need to convince the GM to give you, and these feats to deal 1,000 DMG in 1 hit!” > “Also you need to take a long rest after every battle.” Minmaxer’s strategies offline > Tiefling Bard: “I’ll cast *Hold Person* on the boss and have the Orc Barbarian toss them off skyscraper with 5 bombs attached to their chest just in case.”"

"Unironically, one of the best starts in Burning Wheel is as a housewife. Lemme see if I can dig up ye olde thread... [https://minmaxforum.com/index.php?topic=157.0](https://minmaxforum.com/index.php?topic=157.0)"

"I don't understand the attitude of "just play for fun". Look. I play for fun. But the attitude I'm talking about is this strange idea that 'difficulty/learning mechanics and minmaxing them =/= fun'. It's basically the other side of "Why are you playing that way? You should play haz 5+ and use specific builds". Playing for fun has become the new "Why are you playing that way?". Instead, people should say to play at the speed you're comfortable at, and to try a little higher difficulty when it's second nature. Don't push yourself too hard too fast, and if you don't want to go any further, don't. But I always see some judgement from players who play very casually looking at better players (they"

"So, that's kind of an interesting point, right? If a character behaves rationally, like beep-boop minmax profits and losses and proceed from there, then it really doesn't matter whether they have depth or not, because it won't really impact the story. The entire point of a character with depth, like say Harold Lauder in The Stand , is that that depth gives a reader insight into why they do what they do during the story. It provides tension between what is obviously the correct/logical thing to do, and then trying to predict what the character will actually do and why. If characters are purely rational computational entities, it doesn't really matter what their backstory is, what their motive"

"What's particularly fun if you read some of the modern guides, now that the game is thoroughly understood, is how to game the system. Buy stacks of reagents from the blind women, crashing your honesty to the bottom, then boost it back up in the most expedient way possible later. Steal everything not nailed down in the early part of your run-through (if you play honestly the whole way through, resources are actually sorta hard to come by), then use the stolen money to give to the poor for Sacrifice, then later on fix your honesty (or whatever stealing counts against, I forget) in some expedient manner. I find something quite hilarious about the idea of a MinMaxing Avatar of Virtue. Minmaxing "

"These are extensions that make money and are just in Gmail. Us (Streak YCS11) Yesware Boomerang Bananatag RightInbox Grammarly Cirrus Insight Minmax"

"Finally, a way for me to lose all of my money automatically . What an exciting time to be alive! More seriously, for anyone else who was curious below is a list of the existing integrations. https://nautilustrader.io/docs/latest/integrations/"